What tactic should NOT be used while negotiating with captors?

Making threats during negotiations with captors is ineffective and can escalate tensions, leading to heightened danger for both the negotiator and any individuals in custody. This tactic can undermine trust and communication, which are critical in de-escalating a potentially volatile situation. Threats might provoke aggressive responses from captors, diminish the likelihood of a peaceful resolution, and jeopardize the safety of hostages. It is essential that negotiations remain focused on dialogue aimed at achieving a mutually agreeable outcome, rather than resorting to intimidation or coercive tactics, which can create further conflict and complications. In contrast, controlling communications, stalling for time, and cooperating with trained negotiators are all strategies designed to enhance communication, build rapport, and create a safer environment for resolution.