What dictates the need for moving up the Use of Force Continuum according to S.A.F.E.R.?

The need to move up the Use of Force Continuum is primarily dictated by the perceived threat level to safety. This principle is rooted in the necessity for law enforcement officers, including Coast Guard personnel, to react appropriately to the situation they are encountering. When officers assess a scenario, their evaluation of the perceived threat informs their decision-making process regarding the level of force necessary to ensure their safety and the safety of others.

If the perceived threat level is high, officers are justified in escalating their response to adequately address that threat, ensuring they have the means to protect themselves, civilians, and other personnel involved. This approach ensures that the response is proportional to the threat faced, aligning with principles of sound judgment and safety protocols during encounters.

While factors such as the presence of witnesses, response times of backup units, and legal ramifications are important considerations in the overall context of law enforcement engagements, they do not directly dictate the immediate need for force escalation in the same direct manner as the perceived threat level does. The focus on safeguarding life and maintaining control of a potentially dangerous situation is paramount and is the primary influence that guides the movement up the Use of Force Continuum.